Saturday, September 24, 2011

More Offices Let Workers Choose Their Own Devices

Good article from the New York Times: on how important it is to intergrate your smart phone with your job at a Corporation or how you own you own Business.....

More Offices Let Workers Choose Their Own Devices

Thor Swift for The New York Times
At Citrix Systems, Berkley Reynolds, left, uses his Alienware laptop, and Alan Meridian, his MacBook Pro, paid for with stipends.
SAN FRANCISCO — Throughout the information age, the corporate I.T. department has stood at the chokepoint of office technology with a firm hand on what equipment and software employees use in the workplace.

Readers’ Comments

They are now in retreat. Employees are bringing in the technology they use at home and demanding the I.T. department accommodate them. The I.T. department often complies.
Some companies have even surrendered to what is being called the consumerization of I.T. At Kraft Foods, the I.T. department’s involvement in choosing technology for employees is limited to handing out a stipend. Employees use the money to buy whatever laptop they want from Best Buy, Amazon.com or the local Apple store.
“We heard from people saying, ‘How come I have better equipment at home?’ ” said Mike Cunningham, chief technology officer for Kraft Foods. “We said, hey, we can address that.”
Encouraging employees to buy their own laptops, or bring their mobile phones and iPads from home, is gaining traction in the workplace. A survey published on Thursday by Forrester Research found that 48 percent of information workers buy smartphones for work without considering what their I.T. department supports. By being more flexible, companies are hoping that workers will be more comfortable with their devices and therefore more productive.
“Bring your own device” policies, as they are called, are also shifting the balance of power among electronics makers. Manufacturers good at selling to consumers are increasingly gaining the upper hand, while those focused on bulk corporate sales are slipping.
The phenomenon is upending the corporate market, which has traditionally hinged on electronics makers cultivating tight relationships with I.T. departments. Dell, Hewlett-Packard and Research in Motion, maker of the BlackBerry, have long dominated the workplace, but Apple and its consumer-friendly blockbusters — the iPhone, iPad and MacBook — have made major inroads.
It’s not just electronics. A variety of online services that were originally aimed at consumers are crossing over. Google is hoping that people using its Gmail and Google Docs products will produce a guerrilla movement inside corporations strong enough to displace Microsoft and its Office suite of software.
Skype, the Internet calling service that started as a way to call friends at no charge, is pushing into the workplace. Dropbox, originally pitched as a way for people to store and share personal documents online, has also gained a foothold in businesses.
“You shouldn’t reject things that make employees more productive, and if those things happen to be consumer technologies, so be it,” said Ted Schadler, an analyst with Forrester Research.
Corporate I.T. departments often resist allowing consumer technology on their networks because of security concerns. Adding a hodgepodge of devices and services also complicates their job.
But I.T. departments are gradually warming to the idea simply because their bosses left them little choice. The I.T. staff may grieve for their lost power, but they do it.
“They’re over the denial and anger stage, and now they are in the acceptance and ‘How can we help?’ stage,” said Mr. Schadler, who co-wrote the book “Empowered,” which addresses consumer technology in the workplace. “What broke the camel’s back was the iPad, because executives brought it into the company and said ‘Hey, you’ve got to support this.’ ”
A survey of more than 1,700 information workers earlier this year by Forrester showed how much of the equipment-buying decision rests with employees. Nearly half of the respondents said that they bought their work smartphone while 41 percent said their employer paid; 9 percent said the cost was shared between the two.
Netflix’s “bring your own device” policy takes into account the blurring of the lines between work and personal time.
“As long as they’re productive, innovative and engaged, we’re happy,” said Steve Swasey, a spokesman for Netflix. Kraft Foods’ “bring your own laptop” policy started a year and half ago, and now around 800 employees receive a stipend — Kraft declined to say how much — to buy either a Windows or Mac computer. Workers who want laptops that cost more than their stipend must pay for the difference out of their own pockets.
Kraft’s program is not quite companywide, however. Executives who handle confidential information, people who use laptops to operate production equipment, and most factory workers are ineligible. “It’s a relatively small part of the company,” Mr. Cunningham. “But it addresses the majority of the noise and complaining.”
Letting workers bring their iPhones and iPads to work can also save companies money. In some cases, employees pay for equipment themselves and seek tech help from store staff rather than their company’s I.T. department. “You can basically outsource your I.T. department to Apple,” said Ben Reitzes, an analyst with Barclays Capital.
A similar B.Y.O.D. program at Citrix Systems, a software maker that also helps its clients implement such programs, saves the company about 20 percent on each laptop over three years. Of the 1,000 or so employees in Citrix’s program, 46 percent have bought Mac computers, according to Paul Martine, Citrix’s chief information officer. “That was a little bit of a surprise.”
There are downsides. Employees who want electronics that cost more than their companies are willing to pay or who desire devices like iPads that often fail to qualify for a stipend, don’t like the additional expense of buying their own devices. Nor do all workers look fondly on spending their weekend at Best Buy to get a laptop fixed (unpaid, of course.)
Ahmed Datoo, chief marketing officer for Zenprise, which helps organizations manage mobile devices on their networks, said some government agencies that handle classified documents use his service to disable cameras on employee smartphones inside the building.
Some financial firms blacklist Facebook, among others, to ensure that all conversations take place on approved services that can be archived.
With its strength in consumer products, Apple is the obvious winner from more flexible corporate technology spending. Sales of Apple devices are strong while the rest of the PC market is weak, although how many of its phones, tablets and laptops are for use in the office is difficult to say.
Meanwhile, sales at places like Dell and RIM that focus on corporations are stagnant or sinking. H.P., which is the leading PC maker and is strong in consumer PCs, is considering jettisoning that business to concentrate on corporate software and services. It even killed off its TouchPad, which was to rival the iPad, and its cellphones. This retreat is occurring because many of those companies are finding they just aren’t that good at selling to consumers. “What you’re seeing is that Apple’s approach is winning, and it is tough for the others to keep up,” Mr. Reitzes said.
“Bring your own device” is not for every company. Because of security concerns and data retention laws, some firms like Wells Fargo do not let employees connect to corporate networks with their personal electronics. Protecting the bank’s customers is more important than any benefit from letting employees use their personal devices for business, said Jim Spicer, chief information officer of corporate technology and data for the company.
But Wells Fargo, like many companies, has expanded the choice of corporate-owned devices that it issues to employees to include more consumer-oriented products.
“The biggest challenge we have today is making sure that we don’t chase every device that comes along,” Mr. Spicer said.

Monday, September 19, 2011

Verizon Embraces 4G Traffic---informative Article

Verizon Embraces 4G Traffic, Throttles 3G

September 19, 2011 | Sarah Reedy | Comments (3)
Share
no ratings
Verizon Wireless 's "network optimization plan" quietly went into effect last week, meaning the carrier began throttling its heaviest 3G data users. It has been plotting this move since February, but enacted it now to encourage these heavy users to upgrade to its fast-growing Long Term Evolution (LTE) network. (See Verizon Sells Out iPhone Pre-Orders, Throttles 3G.)
Throttling will only affect those 3G customers on unlimited data plans that fall in the top 5 percent of data usage and are on a congested cell site, stipulations that Verizon thinks makes it more desirable than its competitors. Users that fall into this category will experience reduced speeds for their current billing cycle and the one following.
Verizon is using this strategy to reduce traffic on its network, but also as a way to encourage its customers to upgrade to LTE smartphones on a more lucrative tiered data plan. Verizon engineer Harrison Duong told Light Reading Mobile at last week's developer conference that it welcomes data traffic on its LTE network, and that includes traffic from chatty apps and from consumers. (See Verizon Rallies Developers for LTE and Photos: Verizon's Developer Conference .)
Why this matters
Verizon already covers more than half of the urban population with LTE, and it's on track to blanket its entire 3G footprint with the faster network by 2013. This is an advantage it will market to consumers and hold over AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T)'s head for as long as it can. (See AT&T LTE Launch Set for Sunday, Verizon Wireless Covers 160M+ With LTE and Verizon Says LTE Will Match 3G Footprint in 2013.)
As part of its bid to make 4G more accessible, the carrier Monday unveiled a new LTE Pantech Co. Ltd. smartphone for $99, significantly less than all its 4G phones to date.
As of now, Verizon does not throttle its LTE users, although it also doesn't offer them unlimited data. Verizon says that it reserves the right to include 4G LTE users at a later date, but right now throttling only applies to its 3G network.

Thursday, September 08, 2011

This is the customers Brain map for the most part--But I have a better answer


 Great article on customers buying habits, and how the market is trending.....But, but what we do, is get you a high end device, at low price.
instead of what the article shows is a low end device at a low end price...


Sarah Reedy
Smartphones Steer Clear of Middle Way
September 7, 2011 | Sarah Reedy | Comments (3)
inShare


12:00 PM -- Motorola Mobility Inc. (NYSE: MMI)'s long-awaited Droid Bionic will finally launch on the Verizon Wireless Long Term Evolution (LTE) network Thursday, just one week before AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) begins selling its first Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. smartphone, the Impulse 4G.

Both these launches are notable even though they represent entirely different ends of the spectrum.

Verizon's new Droid is a top-of-the-line affair, the first smartphone to support both LTE speeds at 5-to-12 Mbit/s download and 2-to-5 Mbit/s upload and a dual-core 1GHz processor. (See Google at the Start of Moto's LTE Race, Moto Mobility Promises 5 LTE Devices for 2011, Moto Ships 250K Xooms But Waits on LTE and CES 2011: Moto's 4G Gadgets Blur Lines.)

The Huawei Impulse, on the other hand, belongs to a new class of entry-level smartphones targeted at price-conscious consumers. It will retail for only US$29.99 on a two-year contract (compared to the Bionic's $299 price tag on contract). (See Android & the Promise of LTE Boost Huawei, Huawei, ZTE: Global Devices With Nice Prices and Huawei Ups Smartphone Target.)

Both of these handsets are significant and are indicative of future trends -- carriers targeting the price sensitive and the price elastic, and smartphones either going all out or just enough. Middle-of-the-road smartphones certainly won't disappear, but they may struggle to find an audience -- something handset makers should pay attention to when choosing which route to take. (See Samsung & Nokia Push Midrange Smartphones and Smartphones to Account for 53% of Sales.)

— Sarah Reedy, Senior Reporter, Light Reading Mobile

Monday, September 05, 2011

AT&T if they are smart know that conservative federal judges will eventually give them the victory in the merger with T-mobile. If the merger does not go through they have to release 6 billion dollars that they have in escrow. Therefore, I am sure the legal battle they are most likely to win, would cost less than that. AT&T's LTE is 3 years away, Verizon LTE is already here. AT&T has not executed the business model as well as Verizon. Therefore, they have to buy T-mobile or start losing market-share. If they decide against the legal battle, then they have to use the 49 billion they have in cash to market well their iphone, network, while speeding up their LTE strategy. If the merger goes through, then prices will go up for the consumer, there will be less choices, and their network will improve slowly, but match the improvement T-Mobile has made in San Diego. If he merger does not go through: AT&T will have to look in the mirror: and begin to execute along the lines as Verizon. As well if the merger does not go through: look for AT&T to add a Verizon Wireless executive that can help them catch up on the operations side.